PEP-518 introduced changes not in Python itself but rather in its ecosystem. The idea is pretty simple: let's store configs for all tools in pyproject.toml file, in tool.TOOL_NAME section. For example, for mypy:
At this moment, almost all popular tools support pyproject.toml as the configuration file, in one way or another: mypy, pytest, coverage, isort, bandit, tox, etc. The only exception from the tooling I know is flake8.
Before pyproject.toml, many tools used to use setup.cfg for the same purpose, but this format (INI) has a few disadvantages compared to TOML: it's not well-standardized, and the only supported type of values is string.
PEP-518 introduced changes not in Python itself but rather in its ecosystem. The idea is pretty simple: let's store configs for all tools in pyproject.toml file, in tool.TOOL_NAME section. For example, for mypy:
At this moment, almost all popular tools support pyproject.toml as the configuration file, in one way or another: mypy, pytest, coverage, isort, bandit, tox, etc. The only exception from the tooling I know is flake8.
Before pyproject.toml, many tools used to use setup.cfg for the same purpose, but this format (INI) has a few disadvantages compared to TOML: it's not well-standardized, and the only supported type of values is string.
BY Python etc
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 280
That growth environment will include rising inflation and interest rates. Those upward shifts naturally accompany healthy growth periods as the demand for resources, products and services rise. Importantly, the Federal Reserve has laid out the rationale for not interfering with that natural growth transition.It's not exactly a fad, but there is a widespread willingness to pay up for a growth story. Classic fundamental analysis takes a back seat. Even negative earnings are ignored. In fact, positive earnings seem to be a limiting measure, producing the question, "Is that all you've got?" The preference is a vision of untold riches when the exciting story plays out as expected.
The messaging service and social-media platform owes creditors roughly $700 million by the end of April, according to people briefed on the company’s plans and loan documents viewed by The Wall Street Journal. At the same time, Telegram Group Inc. must cover rising equipment and bandwidth expenses because of its rapid growth, despite going years without attempting to generate revenue.
